How Community Empowerment through Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Knowledge Fosters Sustainable Innovation

Riti  Naik; N.S.  Sreenivasulu

doi:10.6000/2817-2302.2026.05.03

Authors

Riti Naik The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, India
N.S. Sreenivasulu The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2026.05.03

Keywords:

Traditional Knowledge, Intellectual Property, Community empowerment, innovation, India

Abstract

Intellectual Property (IP) protection is presently the most common method of protection for Traditional Knowledge (TK) in mostly all countries. When any product, process, plant variety, biological resource etc. is accorded IP protection for e.g. under Geographical Indications or under Plant Varieties etc., not only one single creator but an entire community benefits from the protection. Community empowerment refers to the process of enabling communities to increase control over their lives whereby they alone can take life impacting decisions. Looking at communities who are rich in TK, the paper will attempt in drawing the link between how enabling IP protection for their TK can empower communities and make these groups more economically secure. Only laws in India have been used in this paper.

A question then arises whether this entire process fosters innovation? IP has a definitive link with innovation. Works which seek IP protection often have to go through the initial test of novelty, originality or innovation. Looking at the difficulty of passing the test of novelty in the case of TK, talking about innovation in its case seems to be a farfetched idea. However, on the other hand a holistic approach to understand TK entails that any kind of protection of TK, whether it be through IP protection or legal protection or economically-benefitting schemes introduced by the government etc., is not exclusive from empowerment and community strength-building. And when the community flourishes, they will naturally create new methods to express themselves. This is likely to bring in innovation. Without innovation, a culture/community/tradition will eventually fade and die. This paper will argue that there is a mutual relationship between community empowerment through IP protection of TK and innovation.

References

Ahuja VK, Intellectual Property Rights in India (Vol 1, Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa 2009).

Biological Diversity Rules 2004.

Chattopadhyay A, ‘Working on Geographical Indications Act: A Case Study on Darjeeling Tea’ (2012) SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2123048 accessed 14 May 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2123048

Craig G and Mayo M (eds), Community Empowerment- A Reader in Participation and Development (Zed Books 1995).

Dutfield G, ‘From Traditional Medicines to Modern Drugs’ in Tania Bubela and E Richard Gold (eds), Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge- Case Studies and Conflicting Interests (Edward Elgar 2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781002629.00010

Equator Initiative, Kerala Kani Community Welfare Trust, India: Equator Initiative Case Studies Local Sustainable Development Solutions for People, Nature, and Resilient Communities https://www.equatorinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/case_1348161670.pdf accessed 14 May 2026.

Factsheet issued by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity https://leap.unep.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/undb-factsheet-tk-en.pdf accessed 31 July 2024.

Galjart B, ‘Counter-development: Possibilities and Constraints’ in Gary Craig and Marjorie Mayo (eds), Community Empowerment- A Reader in Participation and Development (Zed Books 1995).

GI Registry Record, Application No 237 https://search.ipindia.gov.in/GIRPublic/Application/Details/237 accessed 14 May 2026.

Goodman JR, ‘Patently Inequitable’ (2025) 105 Boston University Law Review 987.

Herman M, ‘The Critical Role of Traditional Knowledge in Social Innovation’ Stanford Social Innovation Review https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_critical_role_of_traditional_knowledge_in_social_innovation accessed 11 April 2022.

Jamal S, Upadhyay A and Moin K, ‘Impact of Geographical Indications on Revitalisation of Local Economy: A Case Study of Darjeeling Tea’ (2024) 29 Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v29i5.4456

Justice Murray Sinclair, speech at the Indigenous Innovation Summit 2015 https://mcconnellfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Indigenous-Innovation-Summit-Report-2015-EN.pdf accessed 14 May 2026.

Kachhawaha US and Sharma K, ‘An Examination Of The Problem Of Biopiracy: Through The Lens Of The Neem Controversy Case’ Panjab University Law Magazine (MAGLAW) (Vol III Issue II).

Kaushar S, ‘Bio-Piracy in India: A Practice of Patenting Traditional Knowledge for Profit’ (2023) 1(1) IPR Journal of Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur 60.

Khuarana T and Saraswat T, ‘The Neem Patent Case’ https://www.mondaq.com/account/register accessed 13 May 2026.

Madhya Pradesh State Biodiversity Board, People’s Biodiversity Register- Technical and Administrative Manual http://www.mpsbb.nic.in/pbr/PBR%20Manual%20and%20Format%20-%20English.pdf accessed 21 April 2022.

Mayo M and Craig G, ‘Community Participation and Empowerment: The Human Face of Structural Adjustment or Tools for Democratic Transformation’ in Gary Craig and Marjorie Mayo (eds), Community Empowerment- A Reader in Participation and Development (Zed Books 1995).

Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, National Handloom Development Programme and Raw Material Supply Scheme https://handlooms.nic.in/ accessed 14 May 2026.

Nerfin M (ed), Another Development- Approaches and Strategies (Dag Hammarskjold Foundation 1977).

Patents Act 1970.

Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act 2001.

Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Rules 2003.

Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Rights Authority, Government of India https://plantauthority.gov.in/search/node/awards accessed 14 May 2026.

Puthrans Associates, ‘Combating Biopiracy: How India’s TKDL Protects Traditional Knowledge’ https://www.puthrans.com/combating-biopiracy-how-indias-tkdl-protects-traditional-knowledge/ accessed 13 May 2026.

Ragavan S, ‘Protection of Traditional Knowledge’ (2001) 2(1) Minnesota Intellectual Property Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24926/15529541.3730

Rahman MA, ‘Participatory Development: Toward Liberation or Co-optation’ in Gary Craig and Marjorie Mayo (eds), Community Empowerment- A Reader in Participation and Development (Zed Books 1995).

Rawlson Wilson V, ‘Intellectual Property as an Essential 21st Century Business Asset’ in Lateef Mtima (ed), Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice- From Swords to Ploughshares (Edward Elgar 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470259.00010

Sachan S and others, ‘Agro-Heritage Tourism and Sustainable Community Development: The Role of Tea Tourism in the Darjeeling Himalayan Cultural Landscape’ https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9049134/v1/0fbf5c7d-2bfa-4167-8eb0-77655a928a48.pdf accessed 14 May 2026.

Sengupta N, Traditional Knowledge in Modern India- Preservation, Promotion, Ethical Access and Benefit Sharing Mechanisms (Springer 2018).

Sengupta N, Traditional Knowledge in Modern India: Preservation, Promotion, Ethical Access and Benefit Sharing Mechanisms (Springer Nature 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3922-2

Shaji KA, ‘Elixir Lost in the Forest: Here is Why Kerala Must Revive Arogyapacha and Jeevani’ https://www.downtoearth.org.in/wildlife-biodiversity/elixir-lost-in-the-forest-here-is-why-kerala-must-revive-arogyapacha-and-jeevani accessed 14 May 2026.

Shiva V, The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (North Atlantic Books 1999).

Sreenivasulu NS, Intellectual Property Rights (2nd rev edn, Regal Publications 2011).

Sreenivasulu NS, Intellectual Property Rights- Dynamic Interfaces (Lexis Nexis 2017).

Sreenivasulu NS, Law Relating to Intellectual Property (3rd edn, Lexis Nexis 2023).

Srivastava SC, ‘Protecting the Geographical Indication for Darjeeling Tea’ in Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies (Cambridge University Press 2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030526.017

Suchitra M, ‘The Kani Learning- How Benefit-sharing Between a Research Institute and the Kani Tribe Went Awry’ https://www.downtoearth.org.in/environment/the-kani-learning-39208 accessed 14 May 2026.

Thanal Trust, ‘Commodification of Nature and Knowledge: The TBGRI–Kani Deal in Kerala’ https://thanaltrust.org/commodification-of-nature-and-knowledge-the-tbgri-kani-deal-in-kerala/ accessed 14 May 2026.

Tiwari G, ‘Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL): India’s Biopiracy Shield, Explained’ https://anantamias.com/traditional-knowledge-digital-library-tkdl-the-biopiracy-shield/ accessed 13 May 2026.

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) http://www.tkdl.res.in/tkdl/langdefault/common/Home.asp?GL=Eng accessed 13 April 2022.

United Nations, ‘Traditional Knowledge Backgrounder’ https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2019/04/Traditional-Knowledge-backgrounder-FINAL.pdf accessed 20 April 2022.

United States Patent and Trademark Office, US Patent No 5,401,504 https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/c5/4a/0f/bd0d3ab5478eaa/US5401504.pdf accessed 13 May 2026.

Whitman JR, ‘An Entrepreneurship Approach to Achieving IP Social Justice’ in Lateef Mtima (ed), Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice- From Swords to Ploughshares (Edward Elgar 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470259.00009

WIPO, ‘Using Traditional Knowledge to Revive the Body and a Community’ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/ip-advantage/w/stories/using-traditional-knowledge-to-revive-the-body-and-a-community accessed 14 May 2026.