Effect of Chlorhexidine 2% versus Alcohol 70% on Catheter -Related Bloodstream Infections in Neonates: Randomized Control Trial

Authors

  • Rania A. El-Farrash Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Egypt
  • Marwa Mamdouh Ashour Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Egypt
  • Marwa Adel Ahmed Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Egypt
  • Yasmin A. Farid Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2026.15.03.3

Keywords:

Neonates, catheter-related bloodstream infection, chlorhexidine, central venous catheter, antisepsis, PICC, NICU

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for neonatal intensive care but are strongly associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), which significantly increase morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. The optimal antiseptic for neonatal skin disinfection remains debated, with chlorhexidine-alcohol solutions increasingly recommended but still under investigation for safety and efficacy.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol versus 70% alcohol alone in reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections among neonates requiring CVCs.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 100 neonates admitted to the NICU at Ain Shams University Hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (alcohol-only antisepsis) and Group B (chlorhexidine-alcohol antisepsis). Data collected included patient demographics, catheter type and duration, infection rates, blood culture results, inflammatory markers, and clinical outcomes.

Results: Group B (chlorhexidine-alcohol) demonstrated significantly lower rates of positive blood cultures (notably Klebsiella and E. coli) compared to Group A. The incidence of infection was highest in neonates with percutaneous central venous catheters (PCVCs) and umbilical venous catheters (UVCs), while peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) showed the lowest infection burden. Mean catheter duration was 9-11 days, with most infections occurring beyond the seventh day. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels declined significantly over time in infected cases. Group B also required fewer escalations to second-line antibiotics.

Conclusions: Using 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol significantly reduced catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in neonates, compared to 70% alcohol alone. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) exhibited the lowest infection rates, highlighting the importance of both antiseptic selection and catheter type in neonatal infection prevention protocols.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/intravascular-catheter-related-infection

Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49(1): 1-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/599376

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definitions for specific types of infections—bloodstream infection event (CLABSI and non-CLABSI). Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn

Kalu IC, Curless MS, Ponnampalavanar S, Milstone AM, Kamar AA. Strategies to reduce hospital-associated bloodstream infections in a limited resource setting: Preventing Infections in Neonates (PIN) collaborative. Antimicrob Stewardsh Healthc Epidemiol 2023; 3(1): e144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.415

Ayala MU, Almendral A, García IJ, Vergeli MR, Porrón R, Maura YL, et al. Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units: the VINCat program 2013-2022. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2025; 43(Suppl): S90-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2024.09.014

Kopsidas I, Collins M, Zaoutis T. Healthcare-associated infections—can we do better? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40(8): e305-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003203

Rani U, Lewis LE, Chawla K, Naha A, Kumar P. Development and evaluation of a prevention bundle for neonatal healthcare-associated infections: an interventional study. F1000Res 2024; 12: 687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132819.2

Capasso A, Paonessa A, Ferrara T, Grasso F, Capasso L, Migliaro F, et al. Use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection during central catheter insertion in premature neonates. J Vasc Access 2025; 26: 11297298251330941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251330941

Clarke P, Soe A, Nichols A, Harizaj H, Webber MA, Linsell L, et al. 2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2024; 109(2): 202-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325871

Eschborn S, Weitkamp JH. Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: review of kinetics and performance for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Perinatol 2019; 39(7): 893-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0363-4

Menchinelli G, Liotti FM, Fiori B, De Angelis G, D’Inzeo T, Giordano L, et al. Corrigendum: In vitro evaluation of BACT/ALERT VIRTUO, BACT/ALERT 3D, and BACTEC FX automated blood culture systems for detection of microbial pathogens using simulated human blood samples. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 221-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02688

Payne V, Hall M, Prieto J. Care bundles to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018; 103(5): F422-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313362

Park S, Moon S, Pai H, Kim B. Appropriate duration of peripherally inserted central catheter maintenance to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection. PLoS One 2020; 15(6): e0234966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234966

Dramowski A, Pillay S, Bekker A, Abrahams I, Cotton MF, Coffin SE, et al. Impact of 1% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and emollient application on bacterial pathogen colonization dynamics in hospitalized preterm neonates: a pilot clinical trial. E Clinical Medicine 2021; 37: 100983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100946

Farrell FD. Mechanical interactions in bacterial colonies and the surfing probability of beneficial mutations. J R Soc Interface 2017; 14(131): 20170073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0073

Folgori L, Tersigni C, Hsia Y. The relationship between Gram-negative colonization and bloodstream infections in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24(3): 251-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.008

Sharma A, Kulkarni S, Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Agarwal R, Deorari AK, et al. Aqueous chlorhexidine 1% versus 2% for neonatal skin antisepsis: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021; 106(6): 643-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-321174

Muller M, Bryant KA, Espinosa C, Jones JA, Quach C, Rindels JR, et al. SHEA Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) White Paper Series: practical approaches for the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44(4): 550-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.53

Pinilla-González A, Pérez-Fiérrez L, Solaz-García A, Torrejón-Rodríguez L, Parra-Llorca A, Pérez-Oliver T, et al. Neonatal skin antisepsis with alcohol-based compared to aqueous 2% chlorhexidine in preterm infants and risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2025 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print]

Bakır E, Sezer TA, Çavuşoğlu H, Parlakay AÖ, Gürsel O. Comparison of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% alcohol and 10% povidone-iodine used for port catheter dressing changes in pediatric hematology-oncology patients: a prospective observational study. Turk Arch Pediatr 2021; 56(5): 451-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21035

Helmi MA, Lai NM, Van Rostenberghe H, Ayub I, Mading E. Antiseptic solutions for skin preparation during central catheter insertion in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 5: CD013841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013841.pub2

Lin MR, Chang PJ, Hsu PC, Lin CS, Chiu CH, Chen CJ. Comparison of efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol and 10% povidone-iodine-alcohol against catheter-related bloodstream infections and bacterial colonization at central venous catheter insertion sites. J Clin Med 2022; 11(8): 2242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11082242

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

El-Farrash, R. A. ., Ashour, M. M. ., Ahmed, M. A. ., & Farid, Y. A. . (2026). Effect of Chlorhexidine 2% versus Alcohol 70% on Catheter -Related Bloodstream Infections in Neonates: Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 15(3), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2026.15.03.3

Issue

Section

General Articles